_setitem_(x, 2) for x, y in ]) and False or check_state() != -1), True)) and display(False) or print() for userinput, aimove in in valid, True)) and False) or. The modulo helps wrap the arithmetic back around the list, so you don't get the index out of range error.Īlso: Don't feel bad, here's 18,000 lines of TTT code:Īnd here's 1 line of TTT: (lambda. Lose_condition = game_boardĪnd then do with what you may, whether another (but more condensed) if statement, a return, or what not. You could possibly write it: win_condition = game_board So instead of going through the hoops of writing out a fairly lengthy if statement like: if player = opponent:Įlif player = 'rock' and opponent = 'paper':Įlif player = 'rock' and 'opponent' = 'scissors':Įlif player = 'paper' and opponent = 'scissors':Įlif player = 'paper' and 'opponent' = 'rock':Įlif player = 'scissors' and opponent = 'rock':Įlif player = 'scissors' and 'opponent' = 'paper': Your loss condition is if the opponent selects game_board, which is 'paper'. Your win condition is if the opponent selects game_board, which is 'scissors'. Let's say you chose 'rock', which is game_board. I found that when you're coding the game rock, paper, scissors, the win condition can be +2 (or -1) of your selection's index, and the loss condition can be +1 (or -2) of your selection's index.Ĭonsider the following: game_board =

On a somewhat similar note of finding patterns while coding:

Tic tac toe board across my screen